BOSTON SPORTS CHICK
  • BLOG
  • DEFLATEGATE
  • GUEST BLOGS
  • GENERAL SPORTS/HOT TOPICS

IS THE BASEBALL HALL OF FAME VOTING PROCESS BROKEN?

1/9/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Curt Schilling's glove displayed at the Baseball Hall of Fame. 3,000 strikeouts for ALS (photo by: Joy Manning)
As are most (all?) voting processes in the United States, the Baseball Hall of Fame's process is broken. 
Currently the process consists of 571 voters having the opportunity to vote for 10 candidates.  If a player's name is on 75% of the ballots (429 votes) they are inducted.  If they are on less than 5% of the ballots they are taken off the ballot.  Anything in between 5% and 75% and the player gets to stay on the ballot for the next year, unless of course they've been on the the ballot 15 times.

Although the math behind the process may seem odd, I don't think that is the problem with the process.  While many of the people voting probably should not have the honor, a changing of the guard may still not fix the issue.  The problem I see with the voting process is that instead of voting whether or not a player deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, voters are also worried about who gets in on the first ballot and adjusting their votes accordingly.  Additionally, voters don't want too many inductees to get in on the same ballot.  So basically instead of just voting for who should or shouldn't get in, the voters are over-analyzing their vote and in turn messing up the whole process.  As an aside, it reminds me of students voting for a student body president who they feel bad for and then getting stuck with some darkhorse candidate who benefited from the front runners losing their votes to the "feel good" candidate.

So who do I think lost out to this type of over-analyzed voting this year?  Without a doubt, I think this is what has happened to Curt Schilling.  In 2013 Schilling was on the ballot for the first time and received 38.8% of the vote. This was in a year when no one was voted into the HOF.  This year he was on the ballot for a second time and received 29.2% of the vote.  Why did he suddenly get less?  Although players usually get more votes their second year, Schilling had some "first-ballot Hall of Famers" to contend with this year.  He also had to deal with voters not wanting too many players getting in this year.  As long as voters are worried about guys getting in on the first ballot and too many getting voted in at once, any subsequent system will be flawed. 

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    ARCHIVES

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013

    OTHER BLOGS YOU SHOULD CHECK OUT

    New England Sports Talk
    Kap Lifestyle

    RSS Feed

    Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly
Photo used under Creative Commons from Eric Kilby